CVE-2026-81736
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-81736 is a high-severity Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop (CWE-1050) vulnerability in Isc (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-10 (Concurrent Session Control) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-80740
Vulnerability Data
If a BIND resolver has cached a tree of SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode records, and is then queried for the root of that tree, the resolver will spend disproportionate CPU time constructing the response. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through…
more
9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
V2.4.1V7.6.2V15.4.3V15.4.4
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
AC-10 caps concurrent sessions, reducing blast radius when a loop consumes session or connection resources.
SA-11 developer testing can discover loops that consume platform resources before deployment.
SC-5 limits effects of DoS events that can result from unbounded resource consumption inside loops.
SC-6 directly protects resource availability by enforcing allocation limits that bound consumption from faulty loops.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Runtime monitoring can detect excessive resource use from loops as an adverse event.
Capacity monitoring and resource management directly limit impact of runaway consumption.
Secure SDLC practices can prevent introduction of unbounded loops during development.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Redundancy can absorb some resource spikes but does not prevent the loop defect.
Logging may detect excessive consumption but does not stop the loop.
Monitoring can alert on resource abuse but does not eliminate the coding flaw.
Secure SDLC processes can catch the weakness during reviews but do not inherently prevent it.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid resource-consuming loops.
Security testing can discover the defect but does not remove it from production code.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271709 OL 9 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic terminate after becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-1050
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
- V-257995 RHEL 9 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic terminate after becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-1050