Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-86218

N-Able N-Central ≤ 2026.3

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD Exploited
Published
06 September 2026
Modified
09 September 2026
KEV Added
08 September 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0074 53th percentile
Risk Priority 75 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-86218 is a critical-severity Static Code Injection (CWE-96) vulnerability in N-Able N-Central. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Embedded Payloads (T1027.009); ranked in the top 47% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

N-central is vulnerable to a pre-auth remote code execution This issue affects N-central: before 2026.3.1.14.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
08 September 2026

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1027.009 Embedded Payloads Stealth
Adversaries may embed payloads within other files to conceal malicious content from defenses.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-8876Same product: N-Able N-Centralboth on KEV
CVE-2025-8875Same product: N-Able N-Centralboth on KEV
CVE-2026-18577Same product: N-Able N-Centralboth on KEV
CVE-2026-18556Same product: N-Able N-Centralboth on KEV
CVE-2025-10231Same product: N-Able N-Central
CVE-2025-11366Same product: N-Able N-Central
CVE-2023-30297Same product: N-Able N-Central
CVE-2025-7051Same product: N-Able N-Central
CVE-2023-47132Same product: N-Able N-Central
CVE-2025-11700Same product: N-Able N-Central

Affected Assets

n-able
n-central
2026.3 · ≤ 2026.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing neutralization of directives in saved code artifacts.

Input validation directly stops unneutralized directives from being inserted into static code resources.

Engineering principles include secure input handling and neutralization requirements that structurally avoid static injection.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization to block static code injection into templates, configs, or libraries.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and sanitization that directly prevents static code injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for neutralizing untrusted input before it is stored in executable resources.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires proper neutralization of directives in templates, libraries and configuration files.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance will detect static code injection but does not prevent it at the source.

mitigates

Change management can catch unsafe code changes but does not enforce input neutralization.

References