Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-8823

Access Control in Mattermost Server 10.11.0 – 10.11.18

Published
22 June 2026
Modified
26 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0032 24th percentile
Risk Priority 21 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-8823 is a low-severity Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) vulnerability in Mattermost Mattermost Server. Its CVSS base score is 3.8 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Account Manipulation (T1098); ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-2 (Account Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 fail to validate bot targets when demoting users to guests which allows a lower-privileged administrator to degrade arbitrary bot accounts via the standard demote-user API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00669

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1098 Account Manipulation Persistence
Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems.
Why these techniques?

Authorization bypass in demote-user API directly enables unauthorized modification of bot account roles/privileges (Account Manipulation).

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

Likely ATT&CK TechniquesAI

Techniques this vulnerability likely enables, inferred from its description, weakness type, and attributed-actor tradecraft. Confidence is per-technique.

T1098 Account Manipulation Persistenceconfidence: HIGH
The vulnerability allows an attacker to demote arbitrary bot accounts to guests, directly enabling account manipulation.
inferred from description + CWE · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-22545Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-26230Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-4274Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-6343Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-2462Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2025-11776Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2024-9155Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-10106Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2026-6739Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server
CVE-2024-42000Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Server

Affected Assets

mattermost
mattermost server
10.11.0 — 10.11.18 · 11.7.0 — 11.7.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-2 Account Management
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces authorization checks on the demote-user API to ensure only appropriately privileged admins can target bot accounts.

prevent

Restricts the capabilities granted to lower-privileged administrator roles so they cannot perform demotion actions on arbitrary bot accounts.

prevent

Defines and enforces account management procedures that include validation rules for demoting users versus bot accounts.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Defining, enforcing, and reviewing access authorizations and least privilege directly prevents incorrect authorization checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring consistency between access rights and classification plus formal approval steps ensures that the authorization logic correctly distinguishes between entities that should and should not be granted access.

prevents

Enforcing policy-driven approval and role-change reviews stops incorrect or stale authorization decisions from remaining in effect after job changes or terminations.

prevents

By tying access rights to identity, device, location and classification, the control reduces the likelihood that an authorization decision will be based on an incorrect or bypassed policy.

References