Security Resilience

CVE-2026-9439

Command Injection

Command Injection
Published
25 May 2026
Modified
23 July 2026
CVSS Score v4 2.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.024 84th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-9439 is a low-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Notion (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 2.1 (Low).

Operationally, ranked in the top 16% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was determined in Edimax BR-6675nD 1.12. Affected is the function stainfo of the file /goform/stainfo. This manipulation of the argument interface causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed…

more

and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)
CWE-74CWE-77

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-8344Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-7692Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-3544Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-10878Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-4203Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-12313Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-15391Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-4537Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-5041Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-1624Shared CWE-74, CWE-77

Affected Assets

Notion
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.16 Monitoring activities partial match
finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of special elements, directly addressing CWE-74.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-74, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.
  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References