Cyber Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-213Exposure of Sensitive Information Due to Incompatible Policies

Abstraction: Base · CVEs in our corpus: 30

The product's intended functionality exposes information to certain actors in accordance with the developer's security policy, but this information is regarded as sensitive according to the intended security policies of other stakeholders such as the product's administrator, users, or others whose information is being processed.

When handling information, the developer must consider whether the information is regarded as sensitive by different stakeholders, such as users or administrators. Each stakeholder effectively has its own intended security policy that the product is expected to uphold. When a developer does not treat that information as sensitive, this can introduce a vulnerability that violates the expectations of the product's users.

Last updated: 04 July 2026 00:28 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: mostly · 12 mapping(s) from 4 framework(s): ATT&CK 6 (partial) · ASVS 5.0 4 (mostly) · STIG ubuntu 24 04 1 (partial) · STIG windows server 2019 1 (partial)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (3)AI

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
PT-2Authority to Process Personally Identifiable InformationPTDemands documented authority and policy alignment for PII processing, reducing exposure due to incompatible or absent policies.
PT-3Personally Identifiable Information Processing PurposesPTDirectly enforces purpose compatibility and policy alignment for PII processing, preventing exposure from incompatible policies.
PE-22Component MarkingPEMarking hardware components with the permitted impact or classification level directly supports consistent policy enforcement, reducing the chance that sensitive data is processed on an incompatible component and thereby exposed.

MITRE ATT&CK techniques this weakness enables

Our own two-way CWE↔ATT&CK cross-walk — a direct mapping with no public source (the CWE→CAPEC→ATT&CK chain leaves most top weaknesses, incl. XSS and SQLi, mapped to nothing). Drafted by Grok and spot-checked by Claude Opus 4.8.

Direction: other covers this; this covers other (F/M/P = full / mostly / partial).

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2019-10102835.57.50.01452019-07-17
CVE-2022-303505.57.50.00732023-03-30
CVE-2023-65175.57.50.00472024-02-08
CVE-2026-33216 UPD5.58.60.00372026-03-25
CVE-2019-102463.55.30.04022019-04-22
CVE-2019-102473.55.30.05782019-04-22
CVE-2017-32113.55.30.00832020-01-15
CVE-2020-16523.55.60.00742020-07-17
CVE-2022-225413.56.50.00762022-04-12
CVE-2022-336923.54.00.00092022-07-12
CVE-2022-336943.54.00.00092022-07-12
CVE-2022-336963.54.00.00092022-07-12
CVE-2022-398483.54.00.00082022-10-07
CVE-2023-274653.54.60.00282023-06-13
CVE-2023-369193.55.30.00402023-07-11
CVE-2023-405703.55.30.00462023-08-25
CVE-2024-72673.56.50.00602024-08-07
CVE-2024-441213.54.30.00292024-09-10
CVE-2023-34413.56.60.00552024-10-01
CVE-2024-493543.55.30.00322025-01-18
CVE-2025-243163.55.30.00292025-02-28
CVE-2025-32791 UPD3.54.30.00232025-04-16
CVE-2025-4976 UPD3.54.30.00392025-07-24
CVE-2025-548313.56.50.00902025-09-26
CVE-2022-287941.52.20.00082022-06-07