CVE-2016-11021
RCE in Dlink Dcs-930L Firmware ≤ 2.12
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2016-11021 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Dlink Dcs-930L Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2016-11021 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) affecting the setSystemCommand function on D-Link DCS-930L network cameras running firmware versions prior to 2.12. The flaw resides in the handling of the SystemCommand parameter, which is passed directly to the underlying operating system without proper sanitization.
A remote attacker who has obtained administrative credentials can supply arbitrary OS commands through this parameter over the network. Successful exploitation grants the ability to execute code with full privileges on the device, resulting in complete control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the camera.
Public exploit code has been available since at least 2015, and the vulnerability is listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, confirming observed in-the-wild use. Upgrading to firmware version 2.12 or later removes the affected setSystemCommand interface.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2016-2012
Vulnerability Data
setSystemCommand on D-Link DCS-930L devices before 2.12 allows a remote attacker to execute code via an OS command in the SystemCommand parameter.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 25 March 2022
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.