Cyber Resilience

CVE-2016-9299

Jenkins ≤ 2.19.2

Public PoCHigh EPSS
Published
12 January 2017
Modified
13 May 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.97 99.9th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2016-9299 is a critical-severity LDAP Injection (CWE-90) vulnerability in Jenkins Jenkins. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 0.1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object, which triggers an LDAP query to a third-party server.

CWE(s)
CWE-90

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-57288Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2024-23897Same product: Jenkins Jenkins
CVE-2023-35141Same product: Jenkins Jenkins
CVE-2025-67639Same product: Jenkins Jenkins
CVE-2025-27624Same product: Jenkins Jenkins
CVE-2026-33002Same product: Jenkins Jenkins
CVE-2024-31445Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-25983Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-23334Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2023-32003Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora

Affected Assets

jenkins
jenkins
≤ 2.19.2 · ≤ 2.31
fedoraproject
fedora
25

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and query parameterization to prevent LDAP injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches LDAP injection via dynamic analysis or fuzzing, but does not prevent it at the source.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and query construction practices that directly prevent LDAP injection.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe construction of directory queries, mitigating LDAP injection.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of LDAP special characters, directly eliminating this weakness.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles none match
mitigates

Secure architecture principles encourage safe query interfaces but do not prescribe the specific coding controls needed for LDAP injection.

References