Cyber Resilience

CVE-2022-36804

RCE in Atlassian Bitbucket 7.0.0 – 7.6.17

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRCECommand Injection
Published
25 August 2022
Modified
24 October 2025
KEV Added
30 September 2022
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 99.9th percentile
Risk Priority 90 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2022-36804 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Atlassian Bitbucket. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2022-36804 is a command injection vulnerability affecting multiple API endpoints in Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Data Center. Impacted versions include 7.0.0 prior to 7.6.17, 7.7.0 prior to 7.17.10, 7.18.0 prior to 7.21.4, 8.0.0 prior to 8.0.3, 8.1.0 prior to 8.1.3, 8.2.0 prior to 8.2.2, and 8.3.0 prior to 8.3.1. The flaw, assigned CWE-78 and CWE-88, permits arbitrary code execution when an attacker supplies crafted input to the affected endpoints.

An attacker who already possesses read access to any public or private repository can exploit the issue by sending a single malicious HTTP request. Successful exploitation grants the ability to run arbitrary commands on the Bitbucket server with the privileges of the application process, resulting in full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact as reflected in the CVSS 8.8 score.

Publicly available references include the Atlassian Jira issue BSERV-13438, which documents the affected releases and the corrected versions, as well as multiple exploit artifacts published on PacketStorm. Upgrading to one of the fixed releases listed in the advisory is the primary mitigation.

PacketStorm hosts working exploit code for the vulnerability, and the EPSS score has reached a peak of 0.9756 with a current value of 0.9440, indicating sustained exploitation interest after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Multiple API endpoints in Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Data Center 7.0.0 before version 7.6.17, from version 7.7.0 before version 7.17.10, from version 7.18.0 before version 7.21.4, from version 8.0.0 before version 8.0.3, from version 8.1.0 before version 8.1.3, and from…

more

version 8.2.0 before version 8.2.2, and from version 8.3.0 before 8.3.1 allows remote attackers with read permissions to a public or private Bitbucket repository to execute arbitrary code by sending a malicious HTTP request. This vulnerability was reported via our Bug Bounty Program by TheGrandPew.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
30 September 2022

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2022-43781Same product: Atlassian Bitbucket
CVE-2026-21571Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2023-22527Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2019-11581Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2019-3398Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2022-26134Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2019-3396Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2021-26084Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2021-26086Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV
CVE-2021-26085Same vendor: Atlassianboth on KEV

Affected Assets

atlassian
bitbucket
8.3.0 · 7.0.0 — 7.6.17 · 7.7.0 — 7.17.10 · 7.18.0 — 7.21.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent argument injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe command-line argument handling and escaping.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe command invocation patterns and favor safer APIs.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require proper neutralization of command arguments, directly eliminating CWE-88.

none

Change management can catch unsafe command patterns during reviews but is not a direct mitigation.

References