Cyber Resilience

CVE-2022-47986

RCE in Ibm Aspera Faspex ≤ 4.4.1

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRansomware-linkedRCEDeserialization
Published
17 February 2023
Modified
27 October 2025
KEV Added
21 February 2023
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 100.0th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2022-47986 is a critical-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Ibm Aspera Faspex. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

IBM Aspera Faspex versions 4.4.2 Patch Level 1 and earlier contain a YAML deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502) that permits remote code execution. The flaw resides in an obsolete API endpoint that processes untrusted YAML input without proper validation, enabling an attacker to supply a malicious payload that the application deserializes and executes. The issue received a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 and was assigned IBM X-Force ID 243512.

A remote attacker with no authentication or user interaction can send a specially crafted request to the exposed obsolete API call and achieve arbitrary code execution on the underlying system, resulting in full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

IBM removed the vulnerable obsolete API in Faspex 4.4.2 Patch Level 2. The vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6952319 directs customers to upgrade to the fixed release to eliminate the affected code path.

Public exploit code for the issue has been posted to PacketStorm, and the CVE maintains a high EPSS score with a recorded peak of 0.9640.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Aspera Faspex 4.4.2 Patch Level 1 and earlier could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a YAML deserialization flaw. By sending a specially crafted obsolete API call, an attacker could exploit this…

more

vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. The obsolete API call was removed in Faspex 4.4.2 PL2. IBM X-Force ID: 243512.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
21 February 2023

Related Threats

Threat-Actor AttributionAI

Cl0p
Cl0p ransomware group exploited CVE-2022-47986 in IBM Aspera Faspex (CISA KEV ransomware flag; Mandiant/Unit 42 reporting).

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-32336Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2020-5741Same product: Microsoft Windowsboth on KEV
CVE-2025-69276Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-22868Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-27875Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2026-20963Same vendor: Microsoftboth on KEV
CVE-2020-17144Same vendor: Microsoftboth on KEV
CVE-2026-45659Same vendor: Microsoftboth on KEV
CVE-2020-0618Same vendor: Microsoftboth on KEV
CVE-2024-38094Same vendor: Microsoftboth on KEV

Affected Assets

ibm
aspera faspex
4.4.2 · ≤ 4.4.1

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-502

Penetration testing supplies malicious serialized objects, detecting unsafe deserialization and supporting corrective actions.

addresses: CWE-502

Evaluation of untrusted data handling (deserialization testing) reveals unsafe processing, which the required remediation process addresses.

addresses: CWE-502

Untrusted serialized data can be deserialized and observed inside the chamber, blocking gadget-chain exploitation outside the sandbox.

addresses: CWE-502

Validates or rejects untrusted serialized data before deserialization occurs.

addresses: CWE-502

Identifies and blocks malicious code introduced through deserialization of untrusted data at system boundaries.

addresses: CWE-502

Integrity verification of serialized information can detect tampering before deserialization occurs.

addresses: CWE-502

Provenance of associated data allows detection of untrusted sources before deserialization or processing occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 none match
prevents

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

finds

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

none

Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.

References