CVE-2023-0572

Ensures audit logging process failures are checked and trigger defined responses instead of remaining unchecked.

Testing IR effectiveness identifies and drives fixes for unchecked error conditions that fail to initiate incident handling.

Mandates ongoing correlation, analysis, and response to monitoring results, reducing unchecked error conditions from control assessments.

Implements detection of unusual or exceptional conditions followed by safe mode entry, reducing the window for exploitation of unchecked conditions.

Training ensures users perform required checks for unusual or exceptional conditions as part of contingency roles, limiting attacker leverage from skipped validations.

Policy enforces checking and handling of error conditions as part of incident response processes.

Formal incident handling procedures enforce checking and acting on error conditions that could indicate security incidents.

Security testing routinely checks for unusual or exceptional inputs/conditions, identifying missing validation steps that flaw remediation then resolves.

Event analysis can surface consequences of unchecked errors but does not enforce error checking itself.

Runtime monitoring can detect anomalous behavior from ignored errors but does not prevent the coding flaw.

Logging can record unhandled exceptions but does not prevent the weakness itself.

Monitoring may detect symptoms of unhandled conditions but does not eliminate the root weakness.

Secure development life cycle requires systematic error handling, reducing unchecked conditions.

Application security requirements include explicit handling of error conditions.