Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-0575

RCE in Yugabytedb ≤ 2.2.0.0

Published
09 February 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0078 53th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-0575 is a high-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Yugabyte Yugabytedb. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 47% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

External Control of Critical State Data, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in YugaByte, Inc. Yugabyte DB on Windows, Linux, MacOS, iOS (DevopsBase.Java:execCommand, TableManager.Java:runCommand modules) allows API Manipulation, Privilege Abuse. This vulnerability is associated with program files…

more

backup.Py. This issue affects Yugabyte DB: Lesser then 2.2.0.0

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-9938Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11157Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-8021Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11688Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-9976Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23251Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-8635Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10928Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-8481Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23315Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

yugabyte
yugabytedb
≤ 2.2.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 4 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V8.4.2
  • V1.3.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-642

Monitors, approves, and documents changes to critical configuration state data, mitigating external control risks.

addresses: CWE-642

Requires authorization and prevents reuse, mitigating external control of critical identifier state data.

addresses: CWE-94

Makes persistent code injection into loaded programs impossible when the executable image itself resides on hardware-protected read-only media.

addresses: CWE-94

Dynamically generated code can be produced and executed inside the isolated chamber, preventing host compromise from code-injection payloads.

addresses: CWE-94

Validates inputs used in dynamic code generation to block injected directives.

addresses: CWE-94

Directly prevents execution of attacker-supplied code written into data memory regions.

addresses: CWE-642

Directly counters external corruption or unavailability of critical state data by mandating and using alternative sources for essential functions.

addresses: CWE-642

Limits external actors' ability to control critical state through input channels.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.DS-01 full match
prevents

Protecting integrity of data-at-rest stops external tampering with stored security-critical state.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Enforcing least-privilege access permissions directly prevents unauthorized actors from reaching critical state data.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network-level controls reduce the attack surface that would otherwise allow external modification of state.

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage external control of security-critical state.

prevents

Information access restriction mechanisms enforce least-privilege access to critical state.

prevents

Access control policies directly limit who can read or modify security-critical state data.

prevents

Managing access rights prevents unauthorized actors from altering critical state stored externally.

prevents

Restricting privileged access rights reduces the chance that state data can be tampered with by unauthorized users.

prevents

Secure development practices can avoid placing critical state in externally writable locations.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248525 All OL 8 local disk partitions must implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure or modification of all information that requires at-rest protection. prevents CWE-642
Oracle Linux 9 (2 rules)
  • V-271811 OL 9 /etc/passwd- file must have mode 0644 or less permissive to prevent unauthorized access. prevents CWE-642
  • V-271756 OL 9 local disk partitions must implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure or modification of all information that requires at rest protection. prevents CWE-642
RHEL 7 (1 rule)
  • V-204627 SNMP community strings on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must be changed from the default. prevents CWE-642

References