Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-26842

XSS in Churchcrm 4.5.3

Public PoCXSS
Published
31 May 2023
Modified
09 January 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.014 70th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-26842 is a medium-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Churchcrm Churchcrm. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Browser Session Hijacking (T1185); ranked in the top 30% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

ChurchCRM version 4.5.3 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in OptionManager.php that permits remote attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts or HTML. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2023-26842 with a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, and a requirement for user interaction that results in changed scope with limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

An authenticated attacker can supply malicious input through the affected component; once stored, the payload executes in the browsers of other users who view the tainted data, enabling actions such as session hijacking or unauthorized actions within the ChurchCRM application.

Public references consist of GitHub disclosure repositories that document the issue but do not detail official patches or mitigation steps from the vendor.

The associated EPSS score reached a peak of 0.1747 after starting from lower values, indicating that exploitation interest increased following public disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A stored Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ChurchCRM 4.5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the OptionManager.php.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1185 Browser Session Hijacking Collection
Adversaries may take advantage of security vulnerabilities and inherent functionality in browser software to change content, modify user-behaviors, and intercept information as part of various browser session hijacking techniques.
T1539 Steal Web Session Cookie Credential Access
An adversary may steal web application or service session cookies and use them to gain access to web applications or Internet services as an authenticated user without needing credentials.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-25346Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-27059Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-31548Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-24686Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-31699Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-38761Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-24690Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-33661Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-26843Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-25347Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm

Affected Assets

churchcrm
churchcrm
4.5.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.2
  • V1.3.2

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-79

Penetration testing submits XSS payloads to web applications, detecting cross-site scripting flaws for subsequent remediation.

addresses: CWE-79

Validates web inputs to reject script-related content that could produce XSS.

addresses: CWE-79

Output validation against expected content can reject or sanitize script content in generated web pages, reducing XSS exploitability.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Secure-coding testing and automated code-analysis tools are applied to detect improper neutralization of script-related content during web-page generation.

prevents

Knowledge exchange on emerging attack techniques and patches reduces the likelihood that cross-site scripting flaws remain unaddressed in deployed applications.

prevents

Operational indicators of compromise for web-application attacks can be incorporated into WAF or input-filtering rules, lowering the likelihood that unsanitized data reaches the browser.

prevents

Requiring language-specific secure-coding standards and automated scanning during the SDLC catches missing output encoding or improper neutralization of untrusted data before the software reaches production.

prevents

Secure-coding standards, SAST scans and removal of insecure code samples together eliminate the failure to neutralize script content that produces cross-site scripting flaws.

none

Webpage malware scanning and block-listing of known malicious sites reduce the likelihood that reflected or stored script payloads reach a user’s browser.

References