Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-26843

XSS in Churchcrm 4.5.3

Public PoCXSS
Published
25 April 2023
Modified
04 February 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.014 70th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-26843 is a medium-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Churchcrm Churchcrm. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Browser Session Hijacking (T1185); ranked in the top 30% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

ChurchCRM version 4.5.3 is affected by a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-26843 and CWE-79. The flaw resides in NoteEditor.php and permits remote injection of arbitrary web scripts or HTML, carrying a CVSS 5.4 score reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, low privileges required, and user interaction with changed scope.

An authenticated attacker with low privileges can supply malicious content through NoteEditor.php; once stored, the payload executes in the context of other users' sessions, enabling limited confidentiality and integrity impacts such as data exposure or unauthorized actions within the application.

Public references consist of GitHub disclosure entries and the ChurchCRM project repository, which document the issue but do not detail specific mitigation steps or patches. The associated EPSS values (current 0.1148, peak 0.1413) indicate moderate exploitation probability without evidence of a pronounced post-disclosure rise.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A stored Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ChurchCRM 4.5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the NoteEditor.php.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1185 Browser Session Hijacking Collection
Adversaries may take advantage of security vulnerabilities and inherent functionality in browser software to change content, modify user-behaviors, and intercept information as part of various browser session hijacking techniques.
T1539 Steal Web Session Cookie Credential Access
An adversary may steal web application or service session cookies and use them to gain access to web applications or Internet services as an authenticated user without needing credentials.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-26842Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-25346Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-27059Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-31548Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-24686Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-31699Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-38761Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-24690Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-33661Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm
CVE-2023-25347Same product: Churchcrm Churchcrm

Affected Assets

churchcrm
churchcrm
4.5.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.2
  • V1.3.2

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-79

Penetration testing submits XSS payloads to web applications, detecting cross-site scripting flaws for subsequent remediation.

addresses: CWE-79

Validates web inputs to reject script-related content that could produce XSS.

addresses: CWE-79

Output validation against expected content can reject or sanitize script content in generated web pages, reducing XSS exploitability.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Secure-coding testing and automated code-analysis tools are applied to detect improper neutralization of script-related content during web-page generation.

prevents

Knowledge exchange on emerging attack techniques and patches reduces the likelihood that cross-site scripting flaws remain unaddressed in deployed applications.

prevents

Operational indicators of compromise for web-application attacks can be incorporated into WAF or input-filtering rules, lowering the likelihood that unsanitized data reaches the browser.

prevents

Requiring language-specific secure-coding standards and automated scanning during the SDLC catches missing output encoding or improper neutralization of untrusted data before the software reaches production.

prevents

Secure-coding standards, SAST scans and removal of insecure code samples together eliminate the failure to neutralize script content that produces cross-site scripting flaws.

none

Webpage malware scanning and block-listing of known malicious sites reduce the likelihood that reflected or stored script payloads reach a user’s browser.

References