Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-4347 is a medium-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Librenms Librenms. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Protocol or Service Impersonation (T1001.003); ranked in the top 0.6% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2023-4347 is a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-79) affecting the LibreNMS network monitoring application in versions prior to 23.8.0. The flaw resides in the web interface and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4, reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required low-privileged authentication, and user interaction.
An authenticated attacker can supply a crafted URL that, when visited by another user, executes arbitrary JavaScript in the victim’s browser context. Successful exploitation yields limited impacts on confidentiality and integrity with scope change, allowing actions such as session token theft or unauthorized configuration changes within the LibreNMS instance.
The referenced GitHub commit (91c57a1ee54631e071b6b0c952d99c8ee892e824) and associated huntr.dev report document the remediation; administrators should upgrade to LibreNMS 23.8.0 or later to eliminate the reflected XSS vectors. The EPSS score has reached a peak of 0.8103 with a current value of 0.7733, indicating sustained but not sharply rising exploitation interest since disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-2325
Vulnerability Data
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository librenms/librenms prior to 23.8.0.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.2V1.3.2
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Penetration testing submits XSS payloads to web applications, detecting cross-site scripting flaws for subsequent remediation.
Validates web inputs to reject script-related content that could produce XSS.
Output validation against expected content can reject or sanitize script content in generated web pages, reducing XSS exploitability.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).
Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.5.6 only promotes membership in groups to improve knowledge, receive alerts, and share information; it performs no action that stops XSS exploitation (or even the underlying neutralization defect) and is a pure dependency for other controls per the owner's labeling rule.