Security Resilience

CVE-2023-47504

Auth Bypass in Elementor Website Builder ≤ 3.16.5

Published
24 April 2024
Modified
28 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.015 73th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-47504 is a medium-severity Improper Authentication (CWE-287) vulnerability in Elementor Website Builder. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked in the top 27% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) and IA-3 (Device Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2023-47504 is an improper authentication vulnerability, tracked under CWE-287, that affects the Elementor Website Builder plugin for WordPress. The flaw resides in insufficient access-control checks and impacts all versions through 3.16.4, allowing callers to reach functionality that should be restricted by ACLs. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5.

An authenticated user with contributor-level privileges can exploit the weakness over the network with low attack complexity. Successful exploitation grants the ability to read arbitrary attachment files stored by the WordPress installation, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of potentially sensitive content without any user interaction.

Public advisories published by Patchstack document the vulnerability as a contributor arbitrary-attachment read issue and point to the availability of a fix in versions newer than 3.16.4. Site operators are therefore advised to apply the latest plugin update to eliminate the exposure.

The associated EPSS score has remained modest, moving only from a low baseline to a current value of 0.0705 with a recorded peak of 0.0784.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper Authentication vulnerability in Elementor Elementor Website Builder allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Elementor Website Builder: from n/a through 3.16.4.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-6757Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2022-1329Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2024-13445Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2024-4107Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2025-3075Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2024-8236Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2024-54444Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2025-8081Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2024-0506Same product: Elementor Website Builder
CVE-2023-33922Same product: Elementor Website Builder

Affected Assets

elementor
website builder
≤ 3.16.5

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Mandates unique identification and authentication of organizational users before access, directly stopping improper authentication.

Requires unique identification and authentication of devices before establishing connections, preventing unauthenticated device claims.

Mandates unique identification and authentication of non-organizational users, directly addressing the weakness for external actors.

Manages authenticators with verification and secure distribution, reducing opportunities for improper authentication.

Enforces access only after approved authorizations, which presupposes correct authentication has occurred.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Mandating segregated approval and oversight for non-human identities reduces the chance that weak or orphaned credentials can be exploited for unauthorized authentication.

blocks

A.5.17 directly mandates generation of non-guessable unique secrets, secure transmission, immediate change of defaults/temporary creds, strong password enforcement, no-reuse, and compromise response, which stops most improper-authentication exploits at source; the bounded remainder is non-password authentication methods and sufficiency-of-proof cases (e.g. IA-2/IA-5 enhancements) left to other controls.

blocks

Security requirements specified early and verified through testing drive the consistent implementation of authentication mechanisms, decreasing the likelihood that authentication steps are omitted or incorrectly applied.

blocks

A.8.26 explicitly requires identifying and addressing authentication-related requirements (including level of trust in identity via 8.5 and 5.17) as part of application development or acquisition, which prevents a slice of CWE-287 but leaves the dominant sufficiency-of-proof aspects (IA-2/IA-5) and many implementation defects untouched.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (least privilege, default-deny, never-trust/always-verify, MFA, end-to-end encryption of requests, distrust-external-input, secure session control, and explicit authentication/authorization in every layer), which directly stops most improper-authentication flaws from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is insufficient-proof cases that live only in the strength or correctness of the credential itself (IA-5/IA-2 territory).

blocks

A.8.5 directly mandates appropriate-strength authentication techniques, MFA for critical systems, protected log-on procedures, brute-force resistance, no cleartext passwords/transmission, and session controls that stop exploitation of insufficient proof of identity; the bounded remainder is cases where the chosen technique itself is flawed or insufficiently implemented (e.g. weak biometrics without fallback).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-287, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-295, CWE-306.

References