CVE-2023-49286

Requires detection and response to audit logging failures as an unusual or exceptional condition.

Implements detection of unusual or exceptional conditions followed by safe mode entry, reducing the window for exploitation of unchecked conditions.

Training ensures users perform required checks for unusual or exceptional conditions as part of contingency roles, limiting attacker leverage from skipped validations.

IR testing directly validates checks for unusual or exceptional conditions that could indicate security incidents.

Requires ongoing monitoring of organization-defined metrics and analysis, enabling checks for unusual or exceptional conditions.

Security testing routinely checks for unusual or exceptional inputs/conditions, identifying missing validation steps that flaw remediation then resolves.

Requires detection of unusual conditions followed by a controlled transition to the defined failure state.

MTTF determination forces explicit checks for conditions that precede predictable component failure.

Runtime monitoring of software can detect assertion-triggered crashes as adverse events.

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record reachable-assertion flaws before deployment.

Generating logs of exceptions and errors enables detection of improper handling of unusual conditions.

Logging can record unhandled exceptions but does not prevent the weakness itself.

Monitoring may detect symptoms of unhandled conditions but does not eliminate the root weakness.

Secure SDLC mandates return-value checks and error handling, directly reducing CWE-253.

Application security requirements include robust error handling that mitigates incorrect return-value checks.

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding practices such as validating function results.