Security Resilience

CVE-2023-51750

Scalefusion 10.5.2

Published
11 January 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0029 20th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-51750 is a medium-severity Incorrect User Management (CWE-286) vulnerability in Scalefusion Scalefusion. Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 20th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-2 (Account Management) and IA-4 (Identifier Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ScaleFusion 10.5.2 does not properly limit users to the Edge application because file downloads can occur. NOTE: the vendor's position is "Not vulnerable if the default Windows device profile configuration is used which utilizes modern management with website allow-listing rules."

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-51751Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2023-36868Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-20670Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2023-41746Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2023-2679Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-0097Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-8033Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-35201Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-0310Same product: Microsoft Windows
CVE-2024-20738Same product: Microsoft Windows

Affected Assets

scalefusion
scalefusion
10.5.2

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-2 directly requires defining, assigning, and controlling user accounts throughout their lifecycle, structurally preventing improper user management.

IA-4 mandates authorized management of user identifiers, stopping the creation or retention of unmanaged user identities.

PS-4 enforces timely disabling and removal of access upon termination, addressing a key failure mode of incorrect ongoing user management.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Access control policies rely on accurate user management but do not themselves define user lifecycle processes.

blocks

A.5.16 directly governs identity lifecycle (unique binding, timely disable/remove, no duplicates, oversight of shared/non-human) which stops most incorrect-user-management flaws from being exploitable; bounded remainder exists for flawed access-rights assignment logic after identity is issued (belongs to A.8.3).

blocks

A.5.18 directly governs the full provisioning, review, adjustment and timely revocation lifecycle for access rights (including segregation, authorization, activation only after approval, and pre-termination review), which stops most incorrect-user-management cases from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is flawed user-lifecycle logic inside the product itself that the organizational process cannot reach.

blocks

A.6.5 defines post-termination responsibilities, confidentiality duties, role handovers and communication processes; it has no bearing on whether a product correctly manages users in its environment, so the weakness can still be present and exploitable.

blocks

A.8.2 directly controls allocation, review, expiry, temporary use, separate identities and higher authentication for privileged rights per 5.15 policy, which stops most incorrect-user-management cases (e.g. over-provisioned or stale privileges) from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is incorrect management that is not privilege-related at all (e.g. ordinary user creation, password resets, or account lockout logic).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-286, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-842.

References