Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-1725

Redhat Openshift Container Platform 4.13 … 4.15

Published
07 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0063 47th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-1725 is a medium-severity Trust Boundary Violation (CWE-501) vulnerability in Redhat Openshift Container Platform. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and AC-16 (Security and Privacy Attributes) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in the kubevirt-csi component of OpenShift Virtualization's Hosted Control Plane (HCP). This issue could allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to the root HCP worker node's volume by creating a custom Persistent Volume that matches…

more

the name of a worker node.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-3089Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2024-8883Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-2585Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-6291Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-5625Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform For Arm64
CVE-2024-1132Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2024-9676Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2024-4629Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-6134Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-6563Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform

Affected Assets

redhat
openshift container platform
4.13, 4.14, 4.15
redhat
openshift container platform for arm64
4.13, 4.14, 4.15
redhat
openshift container platform for ibm z
4.13, 4.14, 4.15
redhat
openshift container platform for linuxone
4.13, 4.14, 4.15
redhat
openshift container platform for power
4.13, 4.14, 4.15

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement directly stops trusted and untrusted data from being combined by applying rules that govern allowable data movements and combinations.

Associating explicit security attributes with data objects enables enforcement mechanisms that keep trust levels from being mixed inside structures.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices (coding standards, reviews, validation) directly prevent mixing trusted and untrusted data inside the same structures.

ID.AM-03 partial match
prevents

Documented data-flow representations make trust boundaries explicit and help surface mixing of trusted/untrusted data.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Logical segmentation and access controls enforce separation between trust domains, reducing the chance of co-mingled data structures.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require explicit trust zones and data segregation, mitigating mixing of trusted/untrusted data.

prevents

Secure coding standards can enforce input validation and data tagging, but do not guarantee architectural separation.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates separation of trusted and untrusted data flows, directly preventing mixing in the same structure.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit trust-boundary definitions and data classification at interfaces.

none

Network segregation reduces external mixing but does not address internal data-structure trust violations.

none

Information access restriction limits who sees data but does not prevent mixing trusted and untrusted data within structures.

References