Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-3089

Redhat Openshift Container Platform For Arm64 4.10 … 4.12

Published
05 July 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0052 41th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-3089 is a high-severity Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 7.0 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat discovered that, when FIPS mode was enabled, not all of the cryptographic modules in use were FIPS-validated.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-5625Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-1725Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2024-4629Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-2585Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-6134Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-6291Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2025-8283Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2025-7519Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-8883Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2023-0264Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux

Affected Assets

redhat
openshift container platform
4.10
redhat
openshift container platform for linuxone
4.10, 4.11, 4.12
redhat
openshift container platform for power
4.10, 4.11, 4.12
redhat
openshift container platform ibm z systems
4.10, 4.11, 4.12
redhat
openshift container platform for arm64
4.10, 4.11, 4.12

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 10 hardening rules · 7 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.2.4
  • V6.2.9
  • V6.2.12
  • V6.4.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-521 CWE-693

Organization-wide password and authentication policies are applied uniformly, preventing weak local password requirements.

addresses: CWE-521 CWE-693

Dedicated security resources support deployment of strong authentication systems and enforcement of robust password policies.

addresses: CWE-693

Implements a reliable, tamperproof protection mechanism whose completeness can be assured.

addresses: CWE-693

Procedures for training on protection mechanisms reduce the chance of protection mechanism failures being present or exploitable.

addresses: CWE-693

Documented procedures to implement assessment, authorization, and monitoring controls prevent these protection mechanisms from failing due to undefined processes.

addresses: CWE-693

Direct evaluation of whether controls produce desired security outcomes detects protection mechanism failures and enables remediation.

addresses: CWE-693

Requires assessment that protection mechanisms are correctly implemented and producing intended security outcomes.

addresses: CWE-693

The POA&M process ensures identified weaknesses in protection mechanisms are documented and scheduled for remediation, reducing the duration they remain exploitable.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 full match
prevents

Explicitly requires enforcing minimum password strength as part of authentication.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Defining and enforcing access authorizations is a protection mechanism; proper use prevents the CWE.

PR.DS-01 mostly match
prevents

Cryptographic and integrity controls are protection mechanisms whose correct deployment mitigates the CWE.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Encryption and integrity protections for transit are explicit protection mechanisms.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Logical network protections are protection mechanisms whose failure matches the CWE.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines ensure protection mechanisms are correctly applied and maintained.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Enforcing minimum length, complexity, non-dictionary, and non-reuse rules directly counters weak password policies that allow attackers to guess or brute-force credentials.

detects

Systematic verification that security mechanisms operate according to defined standards reduces the likelihood that protection mechanisms are bypassed or disabled.

mitigates

Hardening devices, disabling vulnerable protocols, and maintaining accurate network diagrams reduce the likelihood that a protection mechanism is misconfigured or left in a weak state.

none

Requiring defined escalation paths, crisis activation criteria, and coordination procedures strengthens the overall protection mechanism so that a single control failure is less likely to leave the organization exposed.

none

By requiring a documented categorization and decision process for security events, the control ensures that protection mechanisms are not bypassed or ignored when anomalies occur.

none

Identifying and remediating control weaknesses that contributed to an incident reduces the likelihood that protection mechanisms will fail again.

References