Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-21407

Memory Safety in Microsoft Windows Server 2012 r2

Published
12 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.16 97th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-21407 is a high-severity Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Server 2012. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203); ranked in the top 3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Windows Hyper-V contains a remote code execution vulnerability tracked as CVE-2024-21407 and carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1. The flaw is associated with CWE-416 and affects the Hyper-V hypervisor component in supported Windows systems.

An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the issue over the network without user interaction, although successful exploitation requires high attack complexity. Successful attacks grant the ability to execute arbitrary code with impacts reaching high severity for confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected host.

Microsoft has published guidance for the vulnerability in its security update catalog at the referenced MSRC pages, directing administrators to apply the corresponding patches. The associated EPSS score has remained low, moving only from 0.0634 to a peak of 0.0650.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-30086Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-38053Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-21375Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-30082Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-26230Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-38141Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-30028Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-38107Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-21437Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2023-35628Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 10 1507
≤ 10.0.10240.20526
microsoft
windows 10 1607
≤ 10.0.14393.6796
microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.5576
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.4170
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.4170
microsoft
windows 11 21h2
≤ 10.0.22000.2836
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.3296
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.3296
microsoft
windows server 2012
all versions, r2
microsoft
windows server 2016
≤ 10.0.14393.6796
+3 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover use-after-free bugs through dynamic analysis or fuzzing.

Engineering principles can require memory-safe constructs or languages that structurally avoid introducing use-after-free.

Process isolation confines the blast radius of use-after-free memory corruption to a single execution domain.

Memory protection controls limit exploitation impact by blocking unauthorized code execution from dangling pointers.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly incorporate memory-safety tooling and reviews that prevent most use-after-free defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover use-after-free issues via scanning or analysis but do not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching removes known use-after-free instances after they have been introduced in released software.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect use-after-free bugs before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates memory-safety practices that reduce use-after-free defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-management rules that mitigate use-after-free.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety design choices that limit use-after-free exposure.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe avoidance of use-after-free patterns.

prevents

Change-management processes help ensure memory-safety fixes are deployed consistently.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248592 OL 8 must clear memory when it is freed to prevent use-after-free attacks. prevents CWE-416
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
  • V-230279 RHEL 8 must clear memory when it is freed to prevent use-after-free attacks. prevents CWE-416
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-257794 RHEL 9 must clear memory when it is freed to prevent use-after-free attacks. prevents CWE-416

References