Security Resilience

CVE-2024-23971

Command Injection in Chargepoint Home Flex Nema 14-50 Plug Firmware

Published
31 January 2025
Modified
30 September 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0049 41th percentile
Risk Priority 64 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-23971 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Chargepoint Home Flex Nema 14-50 Plug Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-23971 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) affecting ChargePoint Home Flex charging stations. The flaw resides in the handling of OCPP messages, where a user-supplied string lacks proper validation before being passed to a system call. This enables network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of root without requiring authentication.

Network-adjacent attackers can exploit the vulnerability with low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score 8.8). Successful exploitation allows full arbitrary code execution as root, potentially compromising the device's confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The Zero Day Initiative advisory at https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-24-1053/ provides further details on the issue, including potential mitigation guidance.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of ChargePoint Home Flex charging stations. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of OCPP messages. The issue results from…

more

the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-23970Same product: Chargepoint Home Flex Hardwired
CVE-2024-23921Same product: Chargepoint Home Flex Hardwired
CVE-2024-23920Same product: Chargepoint Home Flex Hardwired
CVE-2024-23968Same product: Chargepoint Home Flex Hardwired
CVE-2024-23969Same product: Chargepoint Home Flex Hardwired
CVE-2024-7391Same vendor: Chargepoint
CVE-2026-4156Same vendor: Chargepoint
CVE-2026-4155Same vendor: Chargepoint
CVE-2024-7392Same vendor: Chargepoint
CVE-2026-4157Same vendor: Chargepoint

Affected Assets

chargepoint
home flex nema 14-50 plug firmware
all versions
chargepoint
home flex hardwired firmware
all versions
chargepoint
home flex nema 6-50 plug firmware
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References