Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-24419

Memory Safety in Linuxfoundation Magma ≤ 1.8.0

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
21 January 2025
Modified
18 March 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0059 45th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-24419 is a high-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Magma. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 45th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-24419 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) in the Linux Foundation's Magma project, affecting versions up to and including 1.8.0. The flaw resides in the decode_traffic_flow_template_packet_filter function within the file /3gpp/3gpp_24.008_sm_ies.c. It enables attackers to trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) through a crafted NAS (Non-Access Stratum) packet and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). The issue was addressed in Magma v1.9 via commit 08472ba98b8321f802e95f5622fa90fec2dea486.

The vulnerability is exploitable remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requiring no authentication, privileges, or user interaction. An unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted NAS packet to the affected Magma instance, causing the buffer overflow and resulting in a DoS that severely impacts service availability without affecting confidentiality or integrity.

According to available advisories, mitigation requires updating to Magma v1.9 or applying the specified fixing commit. Further details on the vulnerability and remediation are provided at https://cellularsecurity.org/ransacked.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The Linux Foundation Magma <= 1.8.0 (fixed in v1.9 commit 08472ba98b8321f802e95f5622fa90fec2dea486) was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the decode_traffic_flow_template_packet_filter function at /3gpp/3gpp_24.008_sm_ies.c. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted NAS packet.

CWE(s)
CWE-120

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
attack.mitre.org →
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-24418Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2024-24416Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2024-24417Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2024-24422Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2024-24423Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2023-37032Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2024-24421Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2023-37030Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2023-37029Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma
CVE-2023-37036Same product: Linuxfoundation Magma

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
magma
≤ 1.8.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.

SI-16 Memory Protection partial match

Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.

References