Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-25629 is a medium-severity Buffer Under-read (CWE-127) vulnerability in Fedoraproject Fedora. Its CVSS base score is 4.4 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to RA-5 (Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-22949
Vulnerability Data
c-ares is a C library for asynchronous DNS requests. `ares__read_line()` is used to parse local configuration files such as `/etc/resolv.conf`, `/etc/nsswitch.conf`, the `HOSTALIASES` file, and if using a c-ares version prior to 1.27.0, the `/etc/hosts` file. If any of these…
more
configuration files has an embedded `NULL` character as the first character in a new line, it can lead to attempting to read memory prior to the start of the given buffer which may result in a crash. This issue is fixed in c-ares 1.27.0. No known workarounds exist.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Vulnerability scanning can locate known buffer-under-read instances in deployed code.
Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, bounds checkers) directly finds buffer under-read flaws before deployment.
Security engineering principles require bounds-checked memory accesses and safe pointer arithmetic that structurally stop buffer under-reads from being introduced.
Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.
Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and static analysis directly prevent introduction of buffer under-reads.
Vulnerability scanning can discover buffer under-read flaws so they can be recorded and fixed.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software removes known instances of buffer under-read.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect buffer under-reads before release.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and bounds checking that can prevent buffer under-reads.
Application security requirements can specify safe buffer handling and bounds checking.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and bounds-checking mechanisms.
Secure coding standards directly require bounds checking and safe pointer arithmetic.