CVE-2024-29296
Portainer 2.19.4
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-29296 is a medium-severity Incorrect User Management (CWE-286) vulnerability in Portainer Portainer. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Account Manipulation (T1098); ranked in the top 34% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-2 (Account Management) and IA-4 (Identifier Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A user enumeration vulnerability exists in Portainer CE version 2.19.4. The flaw occurs in the authentication process, where measurable differences in server response time allow an observer to distinguish between valid and invalid usernames. The issue is tracked as CWE-286 and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.3, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no required credentials.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can repeatedly submit authentication attempts with chosen usernames and analyze timing variations to compile a list of valid accounts. This information can subsequently support more targeted attacks such as credential stuffing or password spraying against the enumerated users.
The EPSS score for the CVE stands at 0.1294 with no material increase from its recorded peak. Public references include a proof-of-concept repository on GitHub, but no vendor advisory or patch details are provided in the available sources.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-26308
Vulnerability Data
A user enumeration vulnerability was found in Portainer CE 2.19.4. This issue occurs during user authentication process, where a difference in response time could allow a remote unauthenticated user to determine if a username is valid or not.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
AC-2 directly requires defining, assigning, and controlling user accounts throughout their lifecycle, structurally preventing improper user management.
IA-4 mandates authorized management of user identifiers, stopping the creation or retention of unmanaged user identities.
PS-4 enforces timely disabling and removal of access upon termination, addressing a key failure mode of incorrect ongoing user management.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Directly addresses management of user identities and credentials throughout their lifecycle.
Covers policy-driven definition and review of user permissions and entitlements.
Supports proper user onboarding by binding verified identities to credentials.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Identity management directly governs the full lifecycle of user accounts, preventing incorrect user management.
Access rights provisioning and de-provisioning ensure users are correctly created, modified, and removed.
Responsibilities after termination or change of employment address removal of user access but not ongoing user management.
Privileged access rights assume correct user accounts exist; the control does not manage user creation or removal.
Access control policies rely on accurate user management but do not themselves define user lifecycle processes.
Information access restriction depends on properly managed users but does not address user management itself.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271707 OL 9 must enable the Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) interface for SSHD. prevents CWE-286
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
- V-257986 RHEL 9 must enable the Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) interface for SSHD. prevents CWE-286