CVE-2024-34166
RCE in Wavlink Wl-Wn533A8 Firmware m33a8.v5030.210505
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-34166 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Wavlink Wl-Wn533A8 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the touchlist_sync.cgi touchlistsync() functionality of the Wavlink AC3000 router running firmware M33A8.V5030.210505. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2024-34166 and assigned CWE-77, permits arbitrary code execution when an attacker supplies a specially crafted sequence of HTTP requests to the affected endpoint. It carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no required credentials or user interaction, and changed scope with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue simply by sending malicious HTTP requests to the device, resulting in execution of arbitrary operating-system commands with the privileges of the web server process. The current and peak EPSS scores both stand at 0.1015, indicating moderate but stable exploitation probability since disclosure.
Public advisories from Talos Intelligence detail the vulnerability and are available at the referenced URLs.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-35163
Vulnerability Data
An os command injection vulnerability exists in the touchlist_sync.cgi touchlistsync() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted set of HTTP requests can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.