Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-3775

Aenrich A\+Hrd 6.8 … 7.2

Published
15 April 2024
Modified
08 April 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0041 34th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-3775 is a medium-severity Argument Injection (CWE-88) vulnerability in Aenrich A\+Hrd. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

aEnrich Technology a+HRD's functionality for downloading files using youtube-dl.exe does not properly restrict user input. This allows attackers to pass arbitrary arguments to youtube-dl.exe, leading to the download of partial unauthorized files.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-0584Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-12869Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2023-20853Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-12871Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2024-3774Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-0585Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2023-20852Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-0586Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-0583Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd
CVE-2025-12870Same product: Aenrich A\+Hrd

Affected Assets

aenrich
a\+hrd
6.8, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing can discover argument-injection flaws in command-construction code but does not stop their introduction.

Input validation directly stops construction of command strings containing unneutralized delimiters or injected arguments.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and command construction to prevent argument injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect argument injection but does not prevent it at the source.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent argument injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe command-line argument handling and escaping.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe command invocation patterns and favor safer APIs.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require proper neutralization of command arguments, directly eliminating CWE-88.

none

Change management can catch unsafe command patterns during reviews but is not a direct mitigation.

References