Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-43095

Google Android 12.0 … 15.0

Published
21 January 2025
Modified
22 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.00084 0.3th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-43095 is a high-severity Observable Discrepancy (CWE-203) vulnerability in Google Android. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Account Discovery (T1087); ranked at the 0.3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-6 (Authentication Feedback) and SI-11 (Error Handling) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-43095 is a logic error (CWE-203) present in multiple locations within Android components, enabling attackers to obtain any system permission. This vulnerability allows for local escalation of privilege without requiring additional execution privileges beyond basic local access. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on January 21, 2025.

A local attacker with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this issue due to its low attack complexity (AC:L). Although the description notes that user interaction is needed for exploitation, the CVSS metrics indicate no user interaction (UI:N). Successful exploitation grants high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts, effectively providing full system-level control.

The Android Security Bulletin for January 2025 at https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2025-01-01 provides details on affected versions and patches to mitigate this vulnerability. Security practitioners should apply the recommended updates promptly to Android devices.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to obtain any system permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for…

more

exploitation.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1087 Account Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of valid accounts, usernames, or email addresses on a system or within a compromised environment.
T1110 Brute Force Credential Access
Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained.
T1595 Active Scanning Reconnaissance
Adversaries may execute active reconnaissance scans to gather information that can be used during targeting.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-48561Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21330Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21293Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-40090Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21332Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21336Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21333Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21344Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21331Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21335Same product: Google Android

Affected Assets

google
android
12.0, 12.1, 13.0, 14.0, 15.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Obscures authentication feedback so that success/failure differences are not observable to attackers.

Requires error messages to avoid revealing exploitable details, directly stopping observable response discrepancies.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent observable response discrepancies via consistent error handling and timing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

none

Accurate, synchronized timestamps reduce observable timing discrepancies that an attacker could exploit to infer sensitive information or distinguish between success and failure paths.

References