Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-48360 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Qualitor Qualitor. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 11% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Qualitor v8.24 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the component /request/viewValidacao.php. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2024-48360 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5, reflecting network-accessible attack complexity that is low and requires no authentication or user interaction. It is classified under CWE-918.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply crafted input to the affected endpoint and cause the application to issue arbitrary requests to internal or external resources. Successful exploitation yields high confidentiality impact by allowing the attacker to read data otherwise inaccessible from outside the network.
Official advisories and patch information are published by the vendor at https://www.qualitor.com.br/official-security-advisory-cve-2024-48360 and https://www.qualitor.com.br/qualitor-8-20, while a technical analysis and proof-of-concept are available at https://github.com/OpenXP-Research/CVE-2024-48360. The associated EPSS score has reached 0.9096.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-43003
Vulnerability Data
Qualitor v8.24 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /request/viewValidacao.php.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.6V1.5.3V5.3.2V10.4.7
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.
Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.
Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.
Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.
Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.