CVE-2024-51138
Memory Safety in Draytek Vigor2962 Firmware ≤ 4.3.2.9
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-51138 is a critical-severity Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121) vulnerability in Draytek Vigor2962 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 39% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-51138 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121) in the URL parsing functionality of the TR069 STUN server present in multiple Draytek Vigor router models. Affected devices include Vigor165/166 running 4.2.7 and earlier, Vigor2620/LTE200 at 3.9.8.9 and earlier, Vigor2860/2925 at 3.9.8 and earlier, Vigor2862/2926 at 3.9.9.5 and earlier, and numerous additional models up through firmware versions such as 4.4.5.3, all of which perform insufficient bounds checking on the quantity of URL parameters.
A remote attacker can exploit the flaw by sending a single crafted request over the network without authentication or user interaction. Successful exploitation grants arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges, corresponding to the CVSS 9.8 rating that reflects full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Public references point to Draytek product information and a technical advisory detailing multiple related issues in the same router family, though no specific patch versions or mitigation steps are enumerated in the available data. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0859 with no observed increase after disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-5925
Vulnerability Data
Vigor165/166 4.2.7 and earlier; Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier; Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier; Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and earlier; Vigor2133/2762/2832 3.9.9 and earlier; Vigor2135/2765/2766 4.4.5. and earlier; Vigor2865/2866/2927 4.4.5.3 and earlier; Vigor2962 4.3.2.8 and earlier; Vigor3912 4.3.6.1 and earlier; Vigor3910 4.4.3.1 and earlier…
more
a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified in the URL parsing functionality of the TR069 STUN server. This flaw occurs due to insufficient bounds checking on the amount of URL parameters, allowing an attacker to exploit the overflow by sending a maliciously crafted request. Consequently, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can discover stack-buffer overflows before deployment.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.
Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly prevent introduction of stack buffer overflows.
Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.
Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing (fuzzing, static analysis) detects stack overflows before release.
Secure SDLC mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent stack overflows.
Application security requirements can specify buffer-size and input-validation rules.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and least-privilege stack usage.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer handling that causes CWE-121.
Change-management gates can enforce security reviews that catch buffer issues.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121