Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-52002 is a high-severity CSRF (CWE-352) vulnerability in Combodo Itop. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Combodo iTop, a web-based IT Service Management tool, is affected by CVE-2024-52002, a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability impacting multiple URL endpoints. The issue is tracked under CWE-352 and received a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no required privileges, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the flaw by causing an authenticated user to visit a crafted page or link, resulting in the execution of unauthorized actions within the application on the victim's behalf.
The GitHub Security Advisory for the vulnerability states that the issue is resolved in iTop 3.2.0 and explicitly advises all users to upgrade, with no workarounds identified. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0699 with no material rise since disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-45811
Vulnerability Data
Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version…
more
3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V3.3.2V3.5.1V10.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Access enforcement requires verifying that state-changing requests originate from the authenticated user rather than a forged cross-site source.
Protecting session authenticity prevents attackers from replaying or forging authenticated requests via the victim's browser.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require anti-CSRF controls such as tokens or SameSite attributes.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
By denying access to phishing or malicious sites, the control lowers the likelihood that a user will be tricked into submitting a forged request that performs an unintended action on another site.