Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-52288

Published
11 November 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 5.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0013 3th percentile
Risk Priority 38 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-52288 is a medium-severity Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel (CWE-924) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) and SC-16 (Transmission of Security and Privacy Attributes) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. In affected versions an unexpected `REPLY_CCRYPT` or `REPLY_RMAC_I` may be introduced into an active stream when…

more

they should not be. Once RMAC_I message can be sent during a session, attacker with MITM access to the communication may intercept the original RMAC_I reply and save it. While the session continues, the attacker will record all of the replies and save them, till capturing the message to be replied (can be detected by ID, length or time based on inspection of visual activity next to the reader) Once attacker captures a session with the message to be replayed, he stops resetting the connection and waits for signal to perform the replay to of the PD to CP message (ex: by signaling remotely to the MIMT device or setting a specific timing). In order to replay, the attacker will craft a specific RMAC_I message in the proper seq of the execution, which will result in reverting the RMAC to the beginning of the session. At that phase - attacker can replay all the messages from the beginning of the session. This issue has been addressed in commit `298576d9` which is included in release version 3.0.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

CWE(s)
CWE-924

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-22372Shared CWE-924
CVE-2025-0592Shared CWE-924
CVE-2023-49933Shared CWE-924
CVE-2026-54891Shared CWE-924
CVE-2023-2885Shared CWE-924
CVE-2024-39229Shared CWE-924
CVE-2019-25719Shared CWE-924
CVE-2026-39827Shared CWE-924
CVE-2023-26979Shared CWE-924
CVE-2024-8933Shared CWE-924

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity good match

Requires protection of integrity for transmitted information, directly stopping the failure to verify messages were unmodified in transit.

SC-16 Transmission of Security and Privacy Attributes partial match

Associates integrity-related security attributes with exchanged information, helping ensure modification can be detected during transmission.

SC-23 Session Authenticity partial match

Protects session authenticity, which structurally reduces the ability to undetectably modify messages in the channel.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.DS-02 full match
prevents

Directly requires integrity protection (e.g., signatures/hashes) for data-in-transit, which prevents the described weakness while also addressing confidentiality/availability.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.20 Networks security mostly match
prevents

Mandates network security controls that can enforce message integrity on channels.

A.8.21 Security of network services mostly match
prevents

Addresses security of network services, which may include integrity mechanisms.

A.8.24 Use of cryptography mostly match
prevents

Cryptography is the primary technical means to enforce message integrity during transmission.

A.5.14 Information transfer partial match
prevents

Requires secure information transfer procedures that can include integrity checks.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can specify integrity protection for transmitted messages.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (4 rules)
  • V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-924
  • V-248823 OL 8 must not have the telnet-server package installed. prevents CWE-924
  • V-248827 OL 8 must not have the rsh-server package installed. prevents CWE-924

References