Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-57590

RCE in Trendnet Tew-632Brp Firmware 1.010b31

RCECommand Injection
Published
27 January 2025
Modified
29 May 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.011 62th percentile
Risk Priority 73 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-57590 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Trendnet Tew-632Brp Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 38% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-57590 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) in TRENDnet TEW-632BRP v1.010B31 devices. The flaw exists in the CGI interface "ntp_sync.cgi", where the "ntp_server" parameter passed via POST requests to the ntp_sync.cgi binary is susceptible to injection, enabling remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands.

Attackers require no privileges (PR:N) and can exploit this remotely over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical). Successful exploitation grants high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H), potentially allowing full device compromise, such as persistent access, data exfiltration, or further network pivoting from the affected router.

Details on mitigation, including any patches or workarounds, are documented in the advisory at https://github.com/IdaJea/IOT_vuln_1/blob/master/tew632/ntp_sync.md.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TRENDnet TEW-632BRP v1.010B31 devices have an OS command injection vulnerability in the CGl interface "ntp_sync.cgi",which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via parameter "ntp_server" passed to the "ntp_sync.cgi" binary through a POST request.

CWE(s)
CWE-77

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-0640Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22545Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-37642Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-0638Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-51835Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22546Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-28353Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-28354Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-49237Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-0919Same vendor: Trendnet

Affected Assets

trendnet
tew-632brp firmware
1.010b31

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments none match
none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References