Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-15137

RCE in Trendnet Tew-800Mb Firmware 1.0.1.0

Published
28 December 2025
Modified
07 January 2026
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.11 95th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-15137 is a high-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Trendnet Tew-800Mb Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-15137 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-74, CWE-77) in the TRENDnet TEW-800MB firmware version 1.0.1.0. The issue resides in the sub_F934 function within the NTPSyncWithHost.cgi file, where improper input handling allows manipulation leading to arbitrary command execution.

Attackers with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this remotely over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), achieving high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H), as scored 8.8 by CVSS 3.1. Successful exploitation enables full system compromise on affected devices.

VulDB advisories note that the vendor was contacted early about the disclosure but provided no response or patches. The exploit is public and available for use, with details in references including https://pentagonal-time-3a7.notion.site/TRENDnet-TEW-800MB-NTP-2c7e5dd4c5a580f999adcaff2c31978b and https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.338515.

No real-world exploitation in the wild has been reported, but the public exploit availability heightens risk for unpatched TRENDnet TEW-800MB devices.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was detected in TRENDnet TEW-800MB 1.0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sub_F934 of the file NTPSyncWithHost.cgi. The manipulation results in command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be…

more

used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-15136Same product: Trendnet Tew-800Mb
CVE-2026-10061Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2026-5184Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2026-5183Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2026-10060Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2025-15139Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-0640Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22545Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-37642Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-0638Same vendor: Trendnet

Affected Assets

trendnet
tew-800mb firmware
1.0.1.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References