Security Resilience

CVE-2024-6126

DoS

Published
03 July 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 3.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0028 19th percentile
Risk Priority 27 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-6126 is a low-severity Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 3.2 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 19th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in the cockpit package. This flaw allows an authenticated user to kill any process when enabling the pam_env's user_readenv option, which leads to a denial of service (DoS) attack.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-27100Shared CWE-400
CVE-2025-52887Shared CWE-400
CVE-2024-47497Shared CWE-400
CVE-2026-91776Shared CWE-400
CVE-2025-9182Shared CWE-400
CVE-2026-4727Shared CWE-400
CVE-2025-53114Shared CWE-400
CVE-2025-27669Shared CWE-400
CVE-2024-29153Shared CWE-400
CVE-2025-70047Shared CWE-400

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-5 directly limits the effects of resource-exhaustion events that constitute uncontrolled consumption.

SC-6 enforces explicit allocation limits on resources, structurally preventing the weakness from occurring.

Process isolation confines resource consumption to separate domains, reducing blast radius without stopping the root flaw.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Resource-utilization monitoring and alerting on bottlenecks or overloads limits the impact of denial-of-service or resource-exhaustion attacks.

blocks

A.8.6's monitoring, stress-testing, projections, tuning, demand-reduction steps (e.g. optimizing queries, deleting obsolete data, restricting non-critical bandwidth) and capacity planning directly stop most uncontrolled consumption from being exploitable by keeping resources within safe bounds; the bounded remainder is algorithmic flaws (e.g. infinite loops, uncontrolled recursion) that no amount of capacity planning can prevent from exhausting a resource when triggered.

finds

Early notification of anomalous resource consumption or system malfunctions enables throttling or isolation before availability is lost.

blocks

Monitoring network service usage and applying controls to restrict access when necessary limits an attacker’s ability to consume excessive resources through unrestricted or unauthenticated service calls.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-400, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-770.

References