Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-0377

Hashicorp Go-Slug ≤ 0.16.3

Published
21 January 2025
Modified
15 December 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0068 49th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-0377 is a high-severity Link Following (CWE-59) vulnerability in Hashicorp Go-Slug. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-0377 is a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-59) in HashiCorp's go-slug library, enabling a zip-slip style attack during tar archive extraction. The flaw arises when a non-existing user-provided path in a tar entry is processed, allowing traversal outside intended directories. Published on 2025-01-21, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), indicating high severity primarily due to confidentiality risks.

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction. By supplying a malicious tar archive, they can traverse paths to access sensitive files, achieving high-impact unauthorized disclosure of information without altering integrity or availability.

HashiCorp's security advisory (HCSEC-2025-01) provides details on the issue and mitigation at https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-01-hashicorp-go-slug-vulnerable-to-zip-slip-attack.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

HashiCorp’s go-slug library is vulnerable to a zip-slip style attack when a non-existing user-provided path is extracted from the tar entry.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
T1547.009 Shortcut Modification Persistence
Adversaries may create or modify shortcuts that can execute a program during system boot or user login.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-8959Same vendor: Hashicorp
CVE-2023-5834Same vendor: Hashicorp
CVE-2024-1329Same vendor: Hashicorp
CVE-2025-54798Shared CWE-59
CVE-2023-37206Shared CWE-59
CVE-2025-59241Shared CWE-59
CVE-2026-6891Shared CWE-59
CVE-2023-36723Shared CWE-59
CVE-2026-54056Shared CWE-59
CVE-2025-69429Shared CWE-59

Affected Assets

hashicorp
go-slug
≤ 0.16.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.4.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Proper enforcement of access authorizations on the resolved target resource stops a link from reaching an unintended object.

Least-privilege limits the damage an attacker can cause after following an unintended link.

Validating file-name inputs can reject or canonicalize names that resolve to links before access occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require code to validate paths and avoid unsafe link following.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect link-following flaws before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can mandate link-resolution checks and canonicalization before file access.

prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly require safe handling of symbolic links and path traversal.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include input validation and safe file-access design patterns.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address canonicalization and symlink attacks during implementation.

mitigates

Access-control rules can limit which files are reachable, reducing exposure to malicious links.

References