Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-1018

Mozilla Firefox ≤ 135.0

Published
04 February 2025
Modified
13 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0041 34th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-1018 is a medium-severity Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames (CWE-1021) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-1018 is a vulnerability in the fullscreen notification handling mechanism within Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird. The issue occurs when the fullscreen notification is prematurely hidden upon quick re-requests for fullscreen by the user, enabling a potential spoofing attack. This flaw affects versions of Firefox and Thunderbird prior to 135 and is associated with CWE-1021, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).

Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low attack complexity, requiring no privileges or specific user interaction beyond normal browser usage. Successful exploitation allows attackers to achieve low-impact integrity violations through spoofing, such as manipulating fullscreen notifications to deceive users.

Mozilla fixed this vulnerability in Firefox 135 and Thunderbird 135. Mitigation details are provided in security advisories MFSA 2025-07 and MFSA 2025-11, along with the Bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910818.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The fullscreen notification is prematurely hidden when fullscreen is re-requested quickly by the user. This could have been leveraged to perform a potential spoofing attack. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 135 and Thunderbird 135.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
T1056 Input Capture Collection
Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information.
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-1019Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2024-11700Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2024-11695Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-12322Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-12323Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2024-7518Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2023-25730Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2024-9397Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2024-2613Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2025-6434Same product: Mozilla Firefox

Affected Assets

mozilla
firefox
≤ 135.0
mozilla
thunderbird
131.0 — 135.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require implementing frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options controls that prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing frame protections, but does not itself implement the control.

degrades

Web filtering can block or sandbox untrusted frames, but does not enforce application-level frame-busting or CSP.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options, directly addressing UI redressing risks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include isolation of UI layers and proper use of browser security controls.

prevents

Secure coding practices directly require implementation of frame-busting headers or CSP frame-ancestors directives.

References