CVE-2025-11302
Memory Safety in Belkin F9K1015 Firmware 1.00.10
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-11302 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Belkin F9K1015 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 40% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-11302 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-119, CWE-120) affecting the Belkin F9K1015 router on firmware version 1.00.10. The flaw exists in an unknown function of the /goform/formWpsStart CGI endpoint, where manipulation of the pinCode argument triggers the overflow. Published on 2025-10-05, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation over the network with low complexity and requires only low privileges, such as those of an authenticated user, but no user interaction. Attackers can achieve high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution or device takeover.
Advisories note that a proof-of-concept exploit has been publicly disclosed on GitHub, including details at https://github.com/panda666-888/vuls/blob/main/belkin/f9k1015/formWpsStart.md and a POC section. VulDB references (https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327183, https://vuldb.com/?id.327183, https://vuldb.com/?submit.661306) document the issue, but the vendor was contacted early without response, and no patches or official mitigations are available.
The exploit disclosure indicates it may be actively used in the wild, though no confirmed real-world incidents are reported in the available data.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-32229
Vulnerability Data
A security vulnerability has been detected in Belkin F9K1015 1.00.10. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/formWpsStart. Such manipulation of the argument pinCode leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed…
more
publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.