Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-14087

Memory Safety in Redhat Enterprise Linux 10.0 … 9.0

Published
10 December 2025
Modified
03 August 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0084 55th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-14087 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 5.6 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 45% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-14087 is a buffer underflow vulnerability (CWE-190) in the GVariant parser of GLib, the core library used in GNOME applications and widely in Linux environments. The flaw causes heap corruption when processing maliciously crafted input strings, potentially leading to denial of service or code execution. It was published on 2025-12-10 with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.6 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).

A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability over the network without requiring privileges or user interaction, though it demands high attack complexity. Exploitation involves feeding specially crafted strings to applications or services that parse GVariant data via GLib, resulting in heap corruption that disrupts service availability or, in some cases, enables arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the affected process.

Red Hat advisories detail mitigation through errata RHSA-2026:7461, which provides updated packages. Further technical details and patches are tracked in the Red Hat CVE page at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14087, Bugzilla entry 2419093, and the upstream GLib issue at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3834.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in GLib (Gnome Lib). This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause heap corruption, leading to a denial of service or potential code execution via a buffer-underflow in the GVariant parser when processing maliciously crafted input…

more

strings.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-14512Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2026-58016Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2026-58014Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2026-58011Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2025-6196Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-58015Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2025-6052Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2025-13601Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2026-58013Same product: Gnome Glib
CVE-2026-58012Same product: Gnome Glib

Affected Assets

gnome
glib
≤ 2.86.3
redhat
enterprise linux
10.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds integer overflow defects before deployment.

Secure engineering principles require use of safe arithmetic constructs or language features that structurally eliminate integer overflow during calculation.

Input validation enforces bounds on values before arithmetic, stopping the conditions that trigger overflow or wraparound.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References