Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-14106

RCE in Zspace Q2C Nas Firmware ≤ 1.1.0210050

Public PoCRCECommand Injection
Published
05 December 2025
Modified
16 December 2025
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.12 96th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-14106 is a high-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Zspace Q2C Nas Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-14106 is a command injection vulnerability in ZSPACE Q2C NAS versions up to 1.1.0210050. The issue affects the zfilev2_api.CloseSafe function, exposed via the /v2/file/safe/close endpoint in the HTTP POST Request Handler component. By manipulating the safe_dir argument, an attacker can inject arbitrary commands, as classified under CWE-74 (injection) and CWE-77 (command injection specifically). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact.

The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by authenticated users with low privileges (PR:L). Attackers can send a crafted HTTP POST request to the affected endpoint, injecting commands through the safe_dir parameter to execute arbitrary system commands on the NAS device. Successful exploitation grants high-level confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts, potentially allowing full compromise of the device, data exfiltration, or further lateral movement.

Advisories from VulDB indicate that the vendor was notified early, confirmed the vulnerability's existence, and plans to release a technical fix, though no patch details or timeline are specified. An exploit is publicly available and may already be in use. Security practitioners should monitor for updates from the vendor and restrict access to the /v2/file/safe/close endpoint where possible.

Notable context includes the public availability of the exploit, increasing the risk of active exploitation against unpatched ZSPACE Q2C NAS deployments.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected is the function zfilev2_api.CloseSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/close of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument safe_dir leads to command injection. The attack is…

more

possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability. A technical fix is planned to be released.

CWE(s)
CWE-74CWE-77

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
attack.mitre.org →
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
attack.mitre.org →
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-14108Same product: Zspace Q2C Nas
CVE-2025-14107Same product: Zspace Q2C Nas
CVE-2025-15132Same vendor: Zspace
CVE-2025-15133Same vendor: Zspace
CVE-2025-15131Same vendor: Zspace
CVE-2025-11331Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-2163Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-1624Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-9581Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-2530Shared CWE-74, CWE-77

Affected Assets

zspace
q2c nas firmware
≤ 1.1.0210050

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

A.8.16 Monitoring activities partial match
finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References