Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-6989

Command Injection in Tenda F453 Firmware 1.0.0.3

Published
25 April 2026
Modified
30 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 2.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.029 86th percentile
Risk Priority 32 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-6989 is a low-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Tenda F453 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 2.1 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 14% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-6989 is a command injection vulnerability affecting the Tenda F453 router firmware versions up to 1.0.0.3. The issue resides in the TendaTelnet function within the /goform/telnet endpoint of the Telnet Service component. Manipulation of this function enables arbitrary command execution, as classified under CWE-74 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component) and CWE-77 (Command Injection). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), indicating medium severity with network accessibility and low attack complexity.

A remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability without user interaction. By sending crafted requests to the affected endpoint, the attacker achieves command injection, potentially leading to limited impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, such as unauthorized access to system information, modification of router settings, or denial of minor services.

Advisories from VulDB detail the vulnerability and recent threat intelligence, while a GitHub repository discloses a public exploit that may be actively used. The vendor's website at tenda.com.cn provides general product information, but no specific patch or mitigation details are outlined in the available references; users should check for firmware updates beyond version 1.0.0.3.

The exploit's public disclosure heightens the risk of real-world exploitation against unpatched Tenda F453 devices.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda F453 up to 1.0.0.3. Impacted is the function TendaTelnet of the file /goform/telnet of the component Telnet Service. Such manipulation leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The…

more

exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-4554Same product: Tenda F453
CVE-2025-7415Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2025-9090Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2026-5339Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2026-1689Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2026-0581Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2026-7469Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2025-15048Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2025-5836Same vendor: Tenda
CVE-2026-1638Same vendor: Tenda

Affected Assets

tenda
f453 firmware
1.0.0.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References