Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:LSummary
CVE-2025-20359 is a medium-severity Buffer Under-read (CWE-127) vulnerability in Cisco (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to RA-5 (Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-34665
Vulnerability Data
Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 HTTP Decoder that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the disclosure of possible sensitive data or cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to crash. This vulnerability…
more
is due to an error in the logic of buffer handling when the MIME fields of the HTTP header are parsed. This can result in a buffer under-read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an established connection that is parsed by Snort 3. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to induce one of two possible outcomes: the unexpected restarting of the Snort 3 Detection Engine, which could cause a denial of service (DoS) condition, or information disclosure of sensitive information in the Snort 3 data stream. Due to the under-read condition, it is possible that sensitive information that is not valid connection data could be returned.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Vulnerability scanning can locate known buffer-under-read instances in deployed code.
Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, bounds checkers) directly finds buffer under-read flaws before deployment.
Security engineering principles require bounds-checked memory accesses and safe pointer arithmetic that structurally stop buffer under-reads from being introduced.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and static analysis directly prevent introduction of buffer under-reads.
Vulnerability scanning can discover buffer under-read flaws so they can be recorded and fixed.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software removes known instances of buffer under-read.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect buffer under-reads before release.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and bounds checking that can prevent buffer under-reads.
Application security requirements can specify safe buffer handling and bounds checking.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and bounds-checking mechanisms.
Secure coding standards directly require bounds checking and safe pointer arithmetic.