Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-23303

Deserialization in Nvidia Nemo ≤ 2.3.2

Published
13 August 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0056 44th percentile
Risk Priority 62 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-23303 is a high-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Nvidia Nemo. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 44th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

NVIDIA NeMo Framework for all platforms is affected by CVE-2025-23303, a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability tracked under CWE-502. The flaw permits an attacker to trigger remote code execution through crafted input, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 reflecting high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An authenticated local user with low privileges can exploit the issue without user interaction by supplying malicious serialized data to the framework. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution and data tampering on the affected system.

The EPSS score remains flat at 0.0324 with no material increase after disclosure. Official details and updates are available in the NVIDIA security advisory and the NVD entry linked from the CVE record.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

NVIDIA NeMo Framework for all platforms contains a vulnerability where a user could cause a deserialization of untrusted data by remote code execution. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution and data tampering.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-23249Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-8476Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2023-26512Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-24186Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23250Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-0129Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23360Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23304Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23251Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-23315Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

nvidia
nemo
≤ 2.3.2

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can uncover deserialization flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops deserialization of untrusted data by ensuring inputs are valid before processing.

Engineering principles such as safe deserialization and input sanitization structurally prevent the weakness from being introduced.

Integrity verification tools can detect malformed or tampered serialized data after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 none match
prevents

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

finds

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

none

Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.

References