Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-25004

LPE in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 r2

Published
14 October 2025
Modified
20 October 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0045 37th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-25004 is a high-severity Improper Access Control (CWE-284) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Server 2008. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper access control in Microsoft PowerShell allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-59201Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-59230Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-58714Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-58726Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-32714Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-29810Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-21337Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-33056Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-54098Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2025-59253Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507

Affected Assets

microsoft
powershell
7.4 — 7.4.13 · 7.5 — 7.5.4
microsoft
windows 10 1507
≤ 10.0.10240.21161 · ≤ 10.0.10240.21161
microsoft
windows 10 1607
≤ 10.0.14393.8519 · ≤ 10.0.14393.8519
microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.7919 · ≤ 10.0.17763.7919
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.6456
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.6456
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.6060
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.6060
microsoft
windows 11 24h2
≤ 10.0.26100.6899
microsoft
windows 11 25h2
≤ 10.0.26200.6899
+7 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-2 Account Management
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 8 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.3.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces approved access authorizations so that an authorized PowerShell user cannot improperly obtain higher privileges.

prevent

Limits privileges assigned to PowerShell users and processes, reducing the impact and feasibility of local elevation.

prevent

Manages creation, modification, and privilege assignment of accounts that could be abused for PowerShell-based escalation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

PR.AA-05 directly enforces policy-based access management and least privilege, eliminating most improper-access-control defects, yet CWE-284 also covers implementation flaws and design gaps outside a single management control.

PR.PS-01 mostly match
prevents

Hardened baselines and deviation monitoring directly eliminate most configuration-induced access-control defects, yet CWE-284 also encompasses code-level and design flaws outside the scope of configuration management alone.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices catch most access-control defects during design/coding/testing (mostly), yet leave residual risk from runtime configuration, architecture, and operational controls (partial).

PR.AA-01 partial match
prevents

PR.AA-01 supplies managed identities/credentials that support but do not implement access-control decisions, so it only partially prevents CWE-284 in either direction.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Authentication directly blocks unauthenticated actors (partial prevention of CWE-284) but leaves authorization logic, policy enforcement, and role checks untouched, so the control neither eliminates nor fully mitigates the broader weakness.

PR.DS-01 partial match
prevents

PR.DS-01 encryption mitigates impact of failed access checks on stored data but neither implements nor constrains access-control logic itself.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Defining and enforcing explicit access rights and restrictions for each entity directly stops the assignment of permissions that exceed what is required, eliminating the root condition that allows improper access control.

prevents

Formal authorization, role-based provisioning, and timely revocation of access rights directly stop the creation of accounts or permissions that exceed what the business actually needs.

prevents

By enforcing explicit rules on which identities or groups may perform read, write, delete or execute operations and by denying anonymous access to sensitive data, the control directly stops the creation of overly permissive or missing access-control checks.

prevents

Requiring one-to-one mapping of identities to entities and timely removal of unused identities directly stops attackers from leveraging stale or shared accounts to bypass access restrictions.

prevents

By explicitly transferring security roles and responsibilities when personnel change jobs or leave, the control reduces the chance that former employees retain access rights they no longer need, thereby limiting improper access control.

prevents

Physical entry controls enforce explicit authorization and authentication at every access point, directly stopping unauthorized actors from reaching information-processing assets.

References