Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-27158 is a high-severity Access of Uninitialized Pointer (CWE-824) vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-27158 is an Access of Uninitialized Pointer vulnerability (CWE-824) affecting Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30225, 20.005.30748, 25.001.20428, and earlier. The flaw enables arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on 2025-03-11.
Exploitation requires user interaction, as a victim must open a malicious file processed by the affected Acrobat Reader. An attacker with no privileges can deliver such a file through common vectors like email attachments or downloads, tricking the user into opening it to trigger the vulnerability and achieve arbitrary code execution under the current user's context.
Adobe Security Bulletin APSB25-14 and Talos Intelligence report TALOS-2025-2135 detail the issue and mitigation steps, including available patches for Acrobat Reader.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-7734
Vulnerability Data
Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30225, 20.005.30748, 25.001.20428 and earlier are affected by an Access of Uninitialized Pointer vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that…
more
a victim must open a malicious file.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover uninitialized pointer accesses through static analysis, dynamic testing, or fuzzing before deployment.
Requiring documented development processes and tools enables use of analyzers or coding standards that identify uninitialized pointer defects.
Security engineering principles can mandate memory-safety practices and language choices that structurally avoid uninitialized pointer use.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent uninitialized pointer bugs via coding standards, analysis, and reviews, but eliminating this single weakness only partially fulfills the broader control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect uninitialized pointer usage before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that reduce uninitialized pointer defects.
Application security requirements can specify pointer initialization rules.
Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe pointer handling.
Secure coding standards directly prohibit use of uninitialized pointers.