Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-28900

CSRF

Published
11 March 2025
Modified
23 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0014 4th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-28900 is a high-severity CSRF (CWE-352) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-28900 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TabGarb Pro WordPress plugin developed by webgarb that enables Stored XSS. The flaw affects TabGarb Pro versions from n/a through 2.6 inclusive and is associated with CWE-352. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L), indicating network accessibility, low attack complexity, no required privileges, user interaction, changed scope, and low impacts across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely without authentication by tricking logged-in users into interacting with a malicious webpage or link that submits a forged request. This leads to the storage of XSS payloads within the plugin, which can then execute in the context of other users viewing affected content, potentially enabling session hijacking, data theft, or further site compromise depending on the payload.

The Patchstack advisory provides details on this WordPress TabGarb Pro plugin vulnerability, including vulnerability specifics and likely mitigation guidance such as updating to a patched version beyond 2.6; practitioners should consult https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/tabgarb/vulnerability/wordpress-tabgarb-pro-plugin-2-6-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve for full remediation steps.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webgarb TabGarb Pro tabgarb allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TabGarb Pro: from n/a through <= 2.6.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-8489Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-51638Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-23804Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-36667Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-26445Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-22601Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-50766Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-9635Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-30541Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-27520Shared CWE-352

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.3.2
  • V3.5.1
  • V10.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement requires verifying that state-changing requests originate from the authenticated user rather than a forged cross-site source.

Protecting session authenticity prevents attackers from replaying or forging authenticated requests via the victim's browser.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require anti-CSRF controls such as tokens or SameSite attributes.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

mitigates

By denying access to phishing or malicious sites, the control lowers the likelihood that a user will be tricked into submitting a forged request that performs an unintended action on another site.

none

Contextual intelligence about emerging CSRF toolkits can be translated into updated anti-CSRF token or same-site policy configurations across applications.

References