Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-30387

Path Traversal in Microsoft Azure Ai Document Intelligence Studio

Published
13 May 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.011 63th percentile
Risk Priority 77 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-30387 is a critical-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Ai Document Intelligence Studio. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 37% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-30387 is a path traversal vulnerability, tracked as CWE-22, affecting Azure. It carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 and permits improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory, enabling unauthorized privilege elevation over a network.

An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the flaw remotely without user interaction to obtain elevated privileges, resulting in high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The Microsoft Security Response Center advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-30387 addresses the issue. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0438 with no material increase since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in Azure allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-32193Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2026-45454Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2004-0847Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2026-21227Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2021-40444Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2015-0016Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2025-60722Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2021-27065Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2023-38176Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-21400Same vendor: Microsoft

Affected Assets

microsoft
azure ai document intelligence studio
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References