Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-36137

Ibm Sterling Connect\ direct

Published
30 October 2025
Modified
12 December 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0033 25th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-36137 is a high-severity Execution with Unnecessary Privileges (CWE-250) vulnerability in Ibm Sterling Connect\. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 25th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.2.0.7 through 6.2.0.9 iFix004, 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.2 iFix001, and 6.3.0.2 through 6.3.0.5 iFix002 incorrectly assigns permissions for maintenance tasks to Control Center Director (CCD) users that could allow a privileged user to escalate their…

more

privileges further due to unnecessary privilege assignment for post update scripts.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-36064Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2025-36063Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2025-36115Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2025-36066Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2025-36113Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2025-36065Same product: Ibm Sterling Connect\
CVE-2024-31890Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-49814Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36356Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-33120Same vendor: Ibm

Affected Assets

ibm
sterling connect\
direct

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • CM-5 Access Restrictions for Change
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 6 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.2.3
  • V13.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly prohibits assignment of unnecessary privileges to CCD users for post-update scripts, eliminating the root cause of the escalation path.

prevent

Enforces the correct permission boundaries on maintenance tasks so that CCD users cannot execute or modify privileged scripts beyond their authorized role.

prevent

Restricts which accounts are allowed to perform configuration or script changes during maintenance windows, limiting the impact of over-privileged CCD accounts.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

PR.AA-05 directly enforces least privilege so largely eliminates CWE-250 at design time, yet the weakness can still arise from runtime escalation paths, third-party code, or misapplied role definitions outside this single control.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring explicit justification and time-limited grants discourages the routine allocation of unnecessary privileges that would otherwise allow execution with more rights than required.

prevents

Restricting privileged utilities to the fewest trusted users and requiring explicit authorization directly stops developers or operators from embedding or invoking code that runs with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

Mandating separate non-privileged identities for routine work and restricting privileged accounts to administrative tasks reduces the chance that everyday operations run with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

The control explicitly calls for minimizing privileged identities and disabling unnecessary accounts, thereby reducing the number of processes that run with unnecessary privileges.

prevents

The requirement to restrict privileged access and apply segregation of duties limits the number of processes or accounts that must run with elevated rights, lowering the impact of unnecessary privilege assignments.

mitigates

Forcing distinct roles for initiating versus executing changes reduces the chance that an individual will run with unnecessary privileges to perform both steps.

References