Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-36186

LPE in Ibm Db2 12.1.0 – 12.1.3

Published
07 November 2025
Modified
18 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0012 2th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-36186 is a high-severity Execution with Unnecessary Privileges (CWE-250) vulnerability in Ibm Db2. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-6 (Least Privilege) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Db2 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) under specific configurations could allow a local user to execute malicious code that escalate their privileges to root due to execution of unnecessary privileges operated at…

more

a higher than minimum level.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-36184Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36185Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2024-22360Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2024-45663Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2026-10109Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2026-7771Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2026-1352Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-2518Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2024-47118Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36136Same product: Ibm Db2

Affected Assets

ibm
db2
12.1.0 — 12.1.3 · 12.1.0 — 12.1.3 · 12.1.0 — 12.1.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • CM-7 Least Functionality
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 6 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.2.3
  • V13.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires that processes and users operate with only the minimum privileges needed, eliminating the unnecessary elevated privileges that enable the local root escalation in this Db2 CVE.

prevent

Enforces access decisions so that Db2 components cannot execute code or operations at a higher privilege level than authorized for the local user.

prevent

Restricts the system to least functionality, preventing Db2 from being configured or installed with unnecessary privileged execution paths under the affected versions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

PR.AA-05 directly enforces least privilege so largely eliminates CWE-250 at design time, yet the weakness can still arise from runtime escalation paths, third-party code, or misapplied role definitions outside this single control.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring explicit justification and time-limited grants discourages the routine allocation of unnecessary privileges that would otherwise allow execution with more rights than required.

prevents

Restricting privileged utilities to the fewest trusted users and requiring explicit authorization directly stops developers or operators from embedding or invoking code that runs with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

Mandating separate non-privileged identities for routine work and restricting privileged accounts to administrative tasks reduces the chance that everyday operations run with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

The control explicitly calls for minimizing privileged identities and disabling unnecessary accounts, thereby reducing the number of processes that run with unnecessary privileges.

prevents

The requirement to restrict privileged access and apply segregation of duties limits the number of processes or accounts that must run with elevated rights, lowering the impact of unnecessary privilege assignments.

mitigates

Forcing distinct roles for initiating versus executing changes reduces the chance that an individual will run with unnecessary privileges to perform both steps.

References