Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-43536

Memory Safety in Apple Ipados ≤ 18.7.3

Published
17 December 2025
Modified
02 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0056 43th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-43536 is a medium-severity Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in Apple Ipados. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-39 (Process Isolation) and SI-16 (Memory Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in Safari 26.2, iOS 18.7.3 and iPadOS 18.7.3, iOS 26.2 and iPadOS 26.2, macOS Tahoe 26.2. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to an unexpected process…

more

crash.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-43368Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43742Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43715Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43717Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43746Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43734Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2022-22620Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2023-28205Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43720Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43726Same product: Apple Ipados

Affected Assets

apple
safari
≤ 26.2
apple
ipados
≤ 18.7.3 · 26.0 — 26.2
apple
iphone os
≤ 18.7.3 · 26.0 — 26.2
apple
macos
≤ 26.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
  • SC-39 Process Isolation
  • SI-3 Malicious Code Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires memory protection mechanisms that prevent use-after-free conditions during processing of untrusted web content.

prevent

Mandates process isolation so that a memory-safety crash in the browser rendering process cannot affect other processes or the host.

prevent

Requires malicious-code protection capabilities that can block or sandbox the delivery and execution of crafted web content exploiting the vulnerability.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly incorporate memory-safety tooling and reviews that prevent most use-after-free defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover use-after-free issues via scanning or analysis but do not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching removes known use-after-free instances after they have been introduced in released software.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect use-after-free bugs before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates memory-safety practices that reduce use-after-free defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-management rules that mitigate use-after-free.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety design choices that limit use-after-free exposure.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe avoidance of use-after-free patterns.

prevents

Change-management processes help ensure memory-safety fixes are deployed consistently.

References