Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-50646 is a high-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Dlink Di-8003 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-50646 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) affecting the D-Link DI-8003 device on firmware version 16.07.26A1. The flaw arises from insufficient input validation on the "name" parameter handled by the /qos_type_asp.asp endpoint, potentially allowing memory corruption when processing malformed requests.
The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating it is exploitable over the network with low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and unchanged impact scope. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted request to the vulnerable endpoint, triggering the buffer overflow and causing a denial-of-service condition through device crash or reboot, with high availability impact but no direct confidentiality or integrity effects.
D-Link has published mitigation guidance in security advisories, including SAP10505 at https://supportannouncement.us.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10505 and the security bulletin page at https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/. Further details appear in the IoT vulnerability collection on GitHub at https://github.com/xiaotea/iot-vulnerability-collection/blob/main/README.md.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-209325
Vulnerability Data
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to insufficient input validation on the name parameter in the /qos_type_asp.asp endpoint.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.